http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11979370

Republicans assert dominance in the bedroom
Magazine article researches which party rates better at sex

MSNBC
Updated: 4:06 p.m. ET March 23, 2006

Tucker Carlson
Anchor, 'The Situation'

Republicans control Congress and the White House. According to an informal study in the latest issue of “GQ” magazine, the GOP is also asserting its dominance over Democrats in the bedroom.

The anonymous author, who wrote the piece for “GQ” reports “After years of intensive research on both sides of the aisle, I’m here to report that Republican men are infinitely better to have sex with.”

The article in the April issue of “GQ” lays out 10 reasons why Republicans are better and kinkier in the sack.

“GQ” deputy editor, Michael Hainey joined Tucker Carlson on ‘Situation’ to explain the magazine’s findings.

To read an excerpt from their conversation, continue to the text below. To watch the video, click on the "Launch" button to the right.

TUCKER CARLSON, HOST, ‘SITUATION’: This is so good. She says—whoever this woman is—I asked you in the commercial break who it was. You would not reveal her name, but I’m kind of in love I have to say, because she writes very well.

She says of Democrats, they’re so emotional and sensitive and genuinely care about your day and how you feel and how you felt yesterday. Is there anything you need, they whimper? Oh shut up, she says.

MICHAEL HAINEY, DEPUTY EDITOR, “GQ”: Right.

CARLSON: They’re too sensitive to be good; that’s her point.

HAINEY: Right. I think, you know, it’s funny. I think she does a great job of saying what I think a lot of Democrats feel. I don’t you. You and I are the same age, but we grew up believing the Democratic Party is the party of JFK, a very randy and virile party.

CARLSON: Yes.

HAINEY: And just like most domestic issues, the Republicans vaulted over the Democrats, you know, and slowly taken what was once their sort of right, which was the sort of party of free love, if you might say. And they’ve become the more virile party. It’s a national disgrace, if you ask me.

CARLSON: Because, in fact, guilt and politics are both the enemies of sex.

HAINEY: Right.

CARLSON: And she makes that point. She has a line in here about Republicans. They understand that foreplay is about sex and lots of it. Democrats are too busy checking if the condoms you keep by the bed are good for the environment.

HAINEY: True. I think she also makes a great point that, you know, Republicans, they’re great on dates, because you know, they’ll just spend and they won’t care about, you know, who pays the bill. So once again, they sort of like spend, have a good time and they’ll worry about it later.

CARLSON: Now, you edit a men’s magazine, so I know you spend a lot of time thinking about the relationship between men and women.

HAINEY: Right.

CARLSON: You really get the sense that this woman is probably a Democrat, probably some center left, you know, kind of moderate Democrat. And for that reason, probably in name a feminist, but everything she says is kind of antifeminist.

She makes the point that men who don’t decide or proclaim where you’re having dinner are wusses. And there’s nothing less appealing than a wuss. Whatever happened to the kind of, you know, the feminist view that we go Dutch on dinner and we, you know, come to a group decision on things like that?

HAINEY: I think she’s simply saying, you know, maybe she’s more of a Hillary Clinton. She wants a stronger man there. I don’t think you should be threatened, Tucker.

CARLSON: I’m not threatened at all. I’m kind of aroused, honestly. I mean, she likes Republicans, because they have no conscience and they’re less sensitive.

HAINEY: Exactly, yes, and because you know, they have no regard for who’s going to be going into debt or anything. She’s like, you know, they come in. They take control. They tell you what they want to do. And I guess she’s found out that’s very attractive to a woman.

CARLSON: “A Republican man will never, ever cry,” she writes. I remember when I was little, like in the ‘70s, long before I was dating, but there was this idea that men who laid out their emotions for women, who wept, you know, and really empathized deeply, and basically acted like Clinton used to in speeches, were irresistible to women. Do you think that’s true?

HAINEY: I think, you know, she’s pointing out that, you know, too many of the Jimmy Carter-Alan Alda era coming off of there in the ‘70s. And you know, Reagan, once again, sort of like set the standard for, you know, what a strong sort of like virile man, a strong and silent type is, you know. And you mentioned Clinton. I mean, the guy obviously had his charms and ways of using them.

CARLSON: I guess it worked. I mean, you can convince women to sleep with you by crying, I guess. It does work.

Now I’ve asked you to synopsize the research of another social scientist, a female, and I think you’ve done a really great job. Let me ask you about something you have more first-hand experience with. Republican women, are they more appealing in bed than Democratic women?

HAINEY: Did I say I’m more experienced with that?

CARLSON: I assume you did.

HAINEY: I have crossed party lines only a couple of times in my life. I don’t know about you, Tucker. But I think that there’s a reason maybe people like Lindsey Graham crossed party lines. You sort of, like, want to experiment, and then you sort of come back to where you want to be.

CARLSON: So there’s no objective answer for that.

HAINEY: No.

CARLSON: The women of one party are not superior to the women of the other party?

HAINEY: You know, if you want to meet later we can go out to some bar and do an experiment. We can do that.

CARLSON: This piece makes a claim, and this is apparently vetted by editors of “GQ” and possibly even you personally about physical attributes of Republican men and saying they’re superior.

But it makes a grandiose claim about Republican men. Do you have research to back that up or is just she going on experience and instinct?

HAINEY: I think, you know, there’s probably no coincidence that the symbol of the party is a Republican. I mean, is an elephant and, you know. You know, some things are hung like elephants, I don’t know. But you know, there’s probably a reason for that.

CARLSON: That is a very solid point. I got through a lot of college English courses without ever seeing the symbolism in the Republican elephant, but now I do.

---

Hehehe :) Looks like I found the perfect counterpoint for Marleys earlier article :ph34r:

Thus irrelevant.

When did rolly start writing for GQ?

Everything's irrelevent.

What? You mean a research study on which political party is better in bed does not meet the scientific criteria needed to establish a legitimate theory? :o Whoda thunk it...


(Im still waiting by the way)

unf

[

and there where people who doubted my style

This post has been edited by Russian: Mar 24 2006, 06:18 AM

This is PartisanSpirit's pathetic attempt to use the subjective assertions of a bed hopping slut to try and counter the whole "Adult conservatives were whiny kids," peer reviewed research paper.

This is the mentality for ignoring source validity and credability that allows conservatives to continue support for Bush in the face of all rationale and reasoning.

Eye-watering stench doesn't count as crying. :)

Not having my credibility attacked by bipartisan Harry!! Oh no!!

Sorry bro, but real women love real men, and real men are obviously conservatives. If a woman wanted a liberal "man", why wouldn't she just go full estrogen and get... another woman?



$$$ :lol:

Depends on your taste. Most girls like assertive but sensitive men. So really, moderates are best in bed. Them, and radical, rugged, bearded revolutionarios like myself ^_^

(Is revolutionarios a word in Spanish, or did I just make that up? Whatever, as long as she doesnt know Spanish!)

This post has been edited by necrolyte: Mar 24 2006, 04:53 PM

I didn't think hippies believed in beds Necro, so how could you be better or worse in one? Isn't using carpentry, with all it's rules and measurements, that you need to make a bed conforming to Republicans (ie "the man")? Don't you guys sleep on moss and grass heaps?

Btw, no woman wants a "sensative" man. They don't want some douche that cries at foreign french films. Yes, they would like a guy that treats them well, but they also **want a man to be a fucking man... hell, at least 95% of the time. I use up my 5% window of femininity by not knowing shit about cars and fleeing from most insects, especially flying ones.


** The only known exception I've found to this rule is that many women like Orlando Bloom and Johnny Depp. I think it's because most women are bi-curious and these individuals offer an easier transition for experimentation.

hahahahaha....

What about domestic French films?

Those you may cry at wantonly, as you would therefore be a Frenchman and crying like a bitch is expected. 'Course, the woman is allowed to allow nature to take it's course and not shave her armpits as well in that case.

QFT

Sensitive is not crying at foreign films, its worrying about her and her feelings. Its about being chivalrous.

Women know that men who ignore their feelings are only compensating for their lack of penile strength.

Yeah but Jonny Depp is a great freaking actor.

Yeah

Does a good pirate IMO

This post has been edited by necrolyte: Mar 24 2006, 07:54 PM

Why? Have you found that introverted men can't pound it as hard? :lol:



True. I think it's fucked up that neither he or Tom Hanks have won an Oscar.

And, I don't blame Depp or Bloom for doing the whole metro thing (I mock it somewhat out of spite). Hey, if I could pull that off I would too. Of course, my ego probably could do without that type of boost.

less serious, more funny please

Yes. Your wife told me last night.

Actually, I meant the men caring about the women's feelings, but whatever.

Bearing in mind that there are several peer reviewed reseach projects to suggest that it is rather conservatives that are whiny little bitch men, therefore not real men by your own assertions, and it is only the anecdotes of one cheap slut that you base you case upon, doesn't it strike you as if, and you may need to unlock the logical section of your brain... don't strain yourself, that you have found yourself inadvertantly arguing your countercase?

You are also mention chick on chick action as if it's a bad thing.

Conservatives are cry-baby weenies, the real men are the moderates.

Necro:



Oh it burns! It burns!!! It... actually, that was pretty soft. Are you being racist against me? Quit oppressing me! Your insults are fallacious!



Kewell:



Go to the doctor, you've just caught a case of acute psedointellectualism.



Not at all. I'm just saying that if a woman is with a liberal, she's just hedging her curiousity rather than finishing the deed and making it with a woman.



LOL, and let me guess, you are a self-proclaimed moderate? Funny if that were so, you'd be getting so worked up over some ribbing of liberals.

Conservatives tend not to experiment, therefore they suck.

Incorrect. Insisting that peer reviewed research findings have more credability than the anecdotes of one trashy little cunt isn't pseudointellectialism, it's common sense.

Sounds like a touch of the green eyed since she's making it with the "liberal" and not yourself.

As you'll find me teeing off on "liberals" (a grotesque misuse of the word, but still) as much as I shred through the combined conservative ignorant foolishness that you and Dakyron throw over the boards like monkeys with their feces, I believe that, contextually, moderate would be the most apt label for me.

My joining of the fray is not so much a defense of "liberals" as it is taking an advantage to swipe at conservatives. Do you see me espousing the sexual prowess of little girly-man cherry toters like Necrotard?

First looking at this I thought you had come up with a clever name for Krell/Lowell then I realized you were only talking to Muz!

When was the last time anyone said someone was "hung like an elephant?" Yeah, exactly, never. When people want to express that a penis is extremely large, what phrase do they use?

Yeah, that's right. "Hung like a donkey." Or a horse. They're all equine and thus the same.

tom hanks won two oscars. one for his role in Forrest Gump and another one for Philadelphia.

Or rather, they don't, which may be your complaint.