Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages  1 2 > 
Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

" width="8" height="8"/> Israel to bomb Iran, (what?)
Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+
zkajan
post Dec 12 2005, 07:13 PM
Post #1


Bosnian MOFO
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,685
Joined: 6-January 04
From: New England
Member No.: 603



Link

QUOTE
Israel readies forces for strike on nuclear Iran

SRAEL’S armed forces have been ordered by Ariel Sharon, the prime minister, to be ready by the end of March for possible strikes on secret uranium enrichment sites in Iran, military sources have revealed.

The order came after Israeli intelligence warned the government that Iran was operating enrichment facilities, believed to be small and concealed in civilian locations.

Iran’s stand-off with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) over nuclear inspections and aggressive rhetoric from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian president, who said last week that Israel should be moved to Europe, are causing mounting concern.

The crisis is set to come to a head in early March, when Mohamed El-Baradei, the head of the IAEA, will present his next report on Iran. El-Baradei, who received the Nobel peace prize yesterday, warned that the world was “losing patience” with Iran.

A senior White House source said the threat of a nuclear Iran was moving to the top of the international agenda and the issue now was: “What next?” That question would have to be answered in the next few months, he said.

Defence sources in Israel believe the end of March to be the “point of no return” after which Iran will have the technical expertise to enrich uranium in sufficient quantities to build a nuclear warhead in two to four years.

“Israel — and not only Israel — cannot accept a nuclear Iran,” Sharon warned recently. “We have the ability to deal with this and we’re making all the necessary preparations to be ready for such a situation.”

The order to prepare for a possible attack went through the Israeli defence ministry to the chief of staff. Sources inside special forces command confirmed that “G” readiness — the highest stage — for an operation was announced last week.

Gholamreza Aghazadeah, head of the Atomic Organisation of Iran, warned yesterday that his country would produce nuclear fuel. “There is no doubt that we have to carry out uranium enrichment,” he said.

He promised it would not be done during forthcoming talks with European negotiators. But although Iran insists it wants only nuclear energy, Israeli intelligence has concluded it is deceiving the world and has no intention of giving up what it believes is its right to develop nuclear weapons.

A “massive” Israeli intelligence operation has been underway since Iran was designated the “top priority for 2005”, according to security sources.

Cross-border operations and signal intelligence from a base established by the Israelis in northern Iraq are said to have identified a number of Iranian uranium enrichment sites unknown to the the IAEA.

Since Israel destroyed the Osirak nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981, “it has been understood that the lesson is, don’t have one site, have 50 sites”, a White House source said.

If a military operation is approved, Israel will use air and ground forces against several nuclear targets in the hope of stalling Tehran’s nuclear programme for years, according to Israeli military sources.

It is believed Israel would call on its top special forces brigade, Unit 262 — the equivalent of the SAS — and the F-15I strategic 69 Squadron, which can strike Iran and return to Israel without refuelling.

“If we opt for the military strike,” said a source, “it must be not less than 100% successful. It will resemble the destruction of the Egyptian air force in three hours in June 1967.”

Aharon Zeevi Farkash, the Israeli military intelligence chief, stepped up the pressure on Iran this month when he warned Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, that “if by the end of March the international community is unable to refer the Iranian issue to the United Nations security council, then we can say the international effort has run its course”.

The March deadline set for military readiness also stems from fears that Iran is improving its own intelligence-gathering capability. In October it launched its first satellite, the Sinah-1, which was carried by a Russian space launcher.

“The Iranians’ space programme is a matter of deep concern to us,” said an Israeli defence source. “If and when we launch an attack on several Iranian targets, the last thing we need is Iranian early warning received by satellite.”

Russia last week signed an estimated $1 billion contract — its largest since 2000 — to sell Iran advanced Tor-M1 systems capable of destroying guided missiles and laser-guided bombs from aircraft.

“Once the Iranians get the Tor-M1, it will make our life much more difficult,” said an Israeli air force source. “The installation of this system can be relatively quick and we can’t waste time on this one.”

The date set for possible Israeli strikes on Iran also coincides with Israel’s general election on March 28, prompting speculation that Sharon may be sabre-rattling for votes.

Benjamin Netanyahu, the frontrunner to lead Likud into the elections, said that if Sharon did not act against Iran, “then when I form the new Israeli government, we’ll do what we did in the past against Saddam’s reactor, which gave us 20 years of tranquillity”.

TEHRAN MINISTER MET MILITANTS BEFORE NEW OFFENSIVE

Iran’s foreign minister met leading figures from three Islamic militant groups to co-ordinate a united front against Israel days before a recent escalation of attacks against Israeli targets shattered fragile ceasefires with Lebanon and the Palestinians, writes Hugh Macleod in Damascus.

The minister, Manouchehr Mottaki, held talks with leaders of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah in Damascus on November 15.

Among those who attended the meeting were Khaled Meshaal, the Hamas leader, and a deputy leader of Islamic Jihad, which claimed responsibility for last Monday’s suicide bombing of a shopping mall in Netanya that killed five Israeli citizens.

Ahmed Jibril, leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine- General Command, was also present. “We all confirmed that what is going on in occupied Palestine is organically connected to what is going on in Iraq, Syria, Iran and Lebanon,” said Jibril.

Seven days after the talks, Hezbollah fired a volley of rockets and mortars at Israeli targets, sparking the fiercest fighting between the two sides since Israel’s withdrawal from south Lebanon five years ago.
Top
User is offlinePM
Quote Post
Bar-Aram
post Dec 12 2005, 08:57 PM
Post #2


starving artist
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,613
Joined: 12-June 03
From: Jnkpings kommun/Sverige
Member No.: 382



If true, and not just rumors, then GREAT!!!
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Dakyron
post Dec 12 2005, 10:07 PM
Post #3


Hates Dirk Nowitski
********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,185
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Phoenix, Arizona(Phoenix)
Member No.: 739



I dont doubt that Israel will do so after the remarks of the Iranian government recently(and in the past)...

Its also a good bargaining chip for Europe/US to imply w/o actually saying it. "Best to save face and go for the negotiated solution now rather than risk being slapped around by Israel later"
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Telum
post Dec 12 2005, 10:39 PM
Post #4


Admin
********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7,429
Joined: 20-December 02
Member No.: 224



Im wondering if Iran will have the guts to strike back.
Top
User is online!PM
Quote Post
Bar-Aram
post Dec 12 2005, 11:15 PM
Post #5


starving artist
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,613
Joined: 12-June 03
From: Jnkpings kommun/Sverige
Member No.: 382



They will make poor Lebanese Shia Muslim farmers do it for them.

This post has been edited by Bar-Aram: Dec 13 2005, 03:41 PM
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Dakyron
post Dec 13 2005, 12:00 AM
Post #6


Hates Dirk Nowitski
********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,185
Joined: 2-July 04
From: Phoenix, Arizona(Phoenix)
Member No.: 739



It will hurt Israeli-Pal peace movement, thats for sure... as undoubtedly, as BA alludes to, Iran will attempt to use terrorism as a way of reprisal...
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Raider
post Dec 13 2005, 06:53 AM
Post #7


Why?
********

Group: JFTD
Posts: 5,736
Joined: 19-August 02
Member No.: 130



at least sharon has balls since bush doesn't seem to...
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Christian
post Dec 13 2005, 02:12 PM
Post #8


God
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,196
Joined: 11-March 03
From: Linkping, Sweden
Member No.: 279



If Israel does this you will have problem with: 1. EU, 2. Russia. 3.Syria, 4.Iran (they have missiles and planes themselves). 5. Pakistan

Anti-Israel emotions will explode in EU, the leaders in EU will be forced to withdraw the freetrade treaty with Israel (both out of legal concerns and public demands, Israeli ambassadors will be called before governaments to explain there actions)

A gigantic military aid program might be sent from Russia to Iran, giving them even more tecnology to use for weapons and possiably nuclear programs.

Pakistan will protest and if it ecalets to full scale war between Israel and Iran Pakistan will deter Israel from using Nukes with statement saying they will retaliate with there own nukes if Israel launches against Iran.

If israel by some stupid reason uses nukes EU will with draw all support whatsoever......

Its a recipe for disaster to attack Iran.
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Bar-Aram
post Dec 13 2005, 03:24 PM
Post #9


starving artist
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,613
Joined: 12-June 03
From: Jnkpings kommun/Sverige
Member No.: 382



It's a recipe for disaster to not attack Iran.
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
LordLeto
post Dec 13 2005, 09:44 PM
Post #10


I don't wear Underpants
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,009
Joined: 16-August 02
From: Texas
Member No.: 103



QUOTE(Christian @ Dec 13 2005, 08:12 AM)
If Israel does this you will have problem with: 1. EU, 2. Russia. 3.Syria, 4.Iran (they have missiles and planes themselves). 5. Pakistan

Anti-Israel emotions will explode in EU, the leaders in EU will be forced to withdraw the freetrade treaty with Israel (both out of legal concerns and public demands, Israeli ambassadors will be called before governaments to explain there actions)

A gigantic military aid program might be sent from Russia to Iran, giving them even more tecnology to use for weapons and possiably nuclear programs.

Pakistan will protest and if it ecalets to full scale war between Israel and Iran Pakistan will deter Israel from using Nukes with statement saying they will retaliate with there own nukes if Israel launches against Iran.

If israel by some stupid reason uses nukes EU will with draw all support whatsoever......

Its a recipe for disaster to attack Iran.
*



Wow, thats some grade A bullshit your spouting there. :lol:
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Ryan_Liam
post Dec 13 2005, 10:13 PM
Post #11


I need a freakin life
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,585
Joined: 27-August 04
Member No.: 768



There should be a MAD strategy in the Middle East as there was in the Cold war. If Iran has nukes then so be it, but the way in which to destroy the clerical regime of Iran is from the inside, and provide a healthy deterrent.

These are reasons as to why Israel or Iran won't attack each other.

This post has been edited by Ryan_Liam: Dec 13 2005, 10:14 PM
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Telum
post Dec 14 2005, 02:57 AM
Post #12


Admin
********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7,429
Joined: 20-December 02
Member No.: 224



QUOTE(Ryan_Liam @ Dec 13 2005, 06:13 PM)
There should be a MAD strategy in the Middle East as there was in the Cold war. If Iran has nukes then so be it, but the way in which to destroy the clerical regime of Iran is from the inside, and provide a healthy deterrent.

These are reasons as to why Israel or Iran won't attack each other.
*



And what if the Ayatollah wakes up one day and decides today is a good day to greet Allah? MAD only works when you have rational people in power.
Top
User is online!PM
Quote Post
Ryan_Liam
post Dec 15 2005, 02:45 AM
Post #13


I need a freakin life
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,585
Joined: 27-August 04
Member No.: 768



QUOTE
And what if the Ayatollah wakes up one day and decides today is a good day to greet Allah? MAD only works when you have rational people in power.


Because there will always be people on both sides who'll practise restraint and will go to lengths to do just that. Besides, since Iran economically is better off than it was in the 80's, there's more to lose now than their was then, plus the Clerics don't want to see their position of power threatened by actually carrying out (openly) the threats they make to boost their popularity.

Notice the words Ahmedijad said, Israel should be wiped off the map, if he was intent on doing that he would of worded it something along the lines of 'Israel will be wiped off the map' you see? The wording gave enough manuver onto which if he failed to keep his promise, he can then declare it was an undesired outcome, not the intended one.

This post has been edited by Ryan_Liam: Dec 15 2005, 02:46 AM
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Christian
post Dec 15 2005, 04:44 PM
Post #14


God
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,196
Joined: 11-March 03
From: Linkping, Sweden
Member No.: 279



QUOTE
Wow, thats some grade A bullshit your spouting there. 



Care to explain why??
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Flyer_Bear
post Dec 16 2005, 10:55 AM
Post #15


I am become Death


Group: Forum Donor
Posts: 869
Joined: 27-February 04
From: RAF Mildenhall, BASTION OF AMERICAN IMPERIALISM
Member No.: 659



QUOTE(Christian @ Dec 15 2005, 04:44 PM)
Care to explain why??
*



Your entire post can be summed up with one word:

Posturing
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
necrolyte
post Dec 16 2005, 11:21 AM
Post #16


Hexakosioihexekontahexaphobe
********

Group: Members
Posts: 9,912
Joined: 21-February 03
Member No.: 271



QUOTE(Telum @ Dec 14 2005, 02:57 AM)
And what if the Ayatollah wakes up one day and decides today is a good day to greet Allah?  MAD only works when you have rational people in power.
*



The Ayatollahs are VERY rational people. They have a hardcore theological outlook, however that does not make them beyond rational thought. Stalin was also a rational man, as was Mao. However, both had serious issues regarding paranoia and megalomania. Rational thought prevented WWIII from being started on their parts.

Castro, however, was willing to start WWIII, because his rationality had lost out to an emotional attatchment to his vision. We know that this has not occured with Iran.

BTW hitting Iran with bombers would be harder than hitting Iraq, and I would be more worried about possible instability in Iraq as a result.
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Russian
post Dec 16 2005, 02:32 PM
Post #17


THE LOVE BELOW
*******

Group: JFTD
Posts: 4,927
Joined: 16-August 02
From: Terra Nullius -00- Status: desperately seeking attention
Member No.: 98



QUOTE
The Ayatollahs are VERY rational people. They have a hardcore theological outlook, however that does not make them beyond rational thought. Stalin was also a rational man, as was Mao. However, both had serious issues regarding paranoia and megalomania. Rational thought prevented WWIII from being started on their parts.




lol
Top
User is offlinePM
Quote Post
Bar-Aram
post Dec 16 2005, 03:53 PM
Post #18


starving artist
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,613
Joined: 12-June 03
From: Jnkpings kommun/Sverige
Member No.: 382



QUOTE(necrolyte @ Dec 16 2005, 01:21 PM)
The Ayatollahs are VERY rational people. They have a hardcore theological outlook, however that does not make them beyond rational thought. Stalin was also a rational man, as was Mao. However, both had serious issues regarding paranoia and megalomania. Rational thought prevented WWIII from being started on their parts.

Castro, however, was willing to start WWIII, because his rationality had lost out to an emotional attatchment to his vision. We know that this has not occured with Iran.

BTW hitting Iran with bombers would be harder than hitting Iraq, and I would be more worried about possible instability in Iraq as a result.
*



Have you been listening to some of the stuff the current president has been saying (even aside from the "Israel needs to be wiped out" and "the holocaust is a myth" crap)? He makes Qaddafi seem remarkably sane in comparison, and that's an accomplishment to be sure. Of course, the ultimate power, as poor Khatami and his supporters know well by now, lies with the top clerics, but so far they have supported his policies.




And I also think the Syrian regime should be bombed.

This post has been edited by Bar-Aram: Dec 16 2005, 04:05 PM
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
necrolyte
post Dec 17 2005, 02:13 AM
Post #19


Hexakosioihexekontahexaphobe
********

Group: Members
Posts: 9,912
Joined: 21-February 03
Member No.: 271



He may say a lot of nutty shit, but its doubtful that he will act on it.
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Bar-Aram
post Dec 17 2005, 07:05 AM
Post #20


starving artist
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,613
Joined: 12-June 03
From: Jnkpings kommun/Sverige
Member No.: 382



The guy seriously thinks the world is about to end. I think he will act on it.








And I also think the Syrian regime should be bombed.

This post has been edited by Bar-Aram: Dec 17 2005, 07:05 AM
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Telum
post Dec 17 2005, 08:09 PM
Post #21


Admin
********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7,429
Joined: 20-December 02
Member No.: 224



Syria delenda est?
Top
User is online!PM
Quote Post
Bar-Aram
post Dec 17 2005, 09:27 PM
Post #22


starving artist
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,613
Joined: 12-June 03
From: Jnkpings kommun/Sverige
Member No.: 382



Something like that. Especially after their vile ambassador to the UN, Faysal Mokdad, refered to their latest victim in Lebanon, Jubran Tueini, as "a dog". Jubran's father, Ghassan Tueni, is now suing Mokdad over the comment





And I also think the Syrian regime should be bombed.
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
QWOT
post Dec 18 2005, 10:15 AM
Post #23


Just me
*******

Group: Moderators
Posts: 4,554
Joined: 18-August 02
From: California, USA
Member No.: 114



QUOTE(Christian @ Dec 15 2005, 08:44 AM)
Care to explain why??
*


One word: Osirak

If anything, Israel will likely get more support than it did 25 years ago. I'd be very surprised if Iraq (i.e the U.S. occupation forces) denied them overflight permission, and absolutely shocked if the U.S. occupiers actually fired on the Israeli aircraft.
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
necrolyte
post Dec 19 2005, 11:47 PM
Post #24


Hexakosioihexekontahexaphobe
********

Group: Members
Posts: 9,912
Joined: 21-February 03
Member No.: 271



QUOTE
And I also think the Syrian regime should be bombed.


And I think Carthage must be destroyed!
-Senator Cato
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Dragonspirit
post Dec 20 2005, 06:15 PM
Post #25


Highlight of the Site
********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7,690
Joined: 21-August 02
From: SoCal, USA
Member No.: 150



QUOTE
If anything, Israel will likely get more support than it did 25 years ago. I'd be very surprised if Iraq (i.e the U.S. occupation forces) denied them overflight permission, and absolutely shocked if the U.S. occupiers actually fired on the Israeli aircraft.


The US and Iraq won't fire or deny them airspace. However, Israel will not get support from many of those that will benefit from it.

The European Union will condemn the action from the safety just bought for them from Israel, just as they failed to stop Iran from going nuclear and even helped create the tolerance for them to do so.

This post has been edited by Dragonspirit: Dec 20 2005, 06:16 PM
Top
User is offlinePM
Quote Post
Harry Kewell
post Jan 6 2006, 03:22 PM
Post #26


The view above the rest of you.
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,955
Joined: 2-March 04
Member No.: 662



With Sharon on death's door, who will have the balls to give the order?
Top
User is offlinePM
Quote Post
zkajan
post Jan 6 2006, 04:47 PM
Post #27


Bosnian MOFO
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,685
Joined: 6-January 04
From: New England
Member No.: 603



QUOTE(Harry Kewell @ Jan 6 2006, 11:22 AM)
With Sharon on death's door, who will have the balls to give the order?
*


i'm sure there will be some other jew more then willing :P
Top
User is offlinePM
Quote Post
gnuneo
post Jan 8 2006, 07:00 PM
Post #28


Nenemo Ari
********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,367
Joined: 17-June 02
From: over..... there.
Member No.: 42



OMFG - the peron i most agree with is ryan.

how the fucking hell has THAT happened? :o :o :o

isreal is rattling sabres, they may have overriding power in the region (thanks to mindblowing amounts of american money), but they simply don't have the resources to attack iran comprehensively, especially as it seems iran now has satellite surveilance to give warning of an attack.

unless iran suddenly goes batshit crazy, they should have 'the bomb' before the US can muster up the support to capture *their* oilfields as well.

oh, of course i mean to say "liberate the iyraynians from their oppressive leaders by slaughtering 10s of thousands of them".


and i agree with necro - the president may have his own religious thing going, but the ayatollahs will reign him in. Does no-one else seem flabbergasted the way the isrealis can openly talk about their *EQUALLY ILLEGAL* nukes and dropping them on people they don't like, yet the other side is assumed to be too far gone to be trusted with such weaponry *BY THE ISREALIS*, and the western media don't even smudge their eyeliner over it.

Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
Christian
post Jan 8 2006, 08:10 PM
Post #29


God
******

Group: Members
Posts: 1,196
Joined: 11-March 03
From: Linkping, Sweden
Member No.: 279



Well one reson to why Israel wont attack or atleast would never be able to win a war is becuse of psycological effects on there own population.


Here is a nice article for you (its 19 pages long and quite good), on the subject of PSYOPS, in the article its about how it works as propaganda and Israel vs Hezbollah is taken as example, (basicaly becuse Hezbollah came up with a new twist to it, ie; video tape everything and broadcast the "good" stuff)


It will give you a perspective to a number of events in the world today and on how nations and organizations use propaganda...


its writen by a person from Israel. (its PDF as attachment)

This post has been edited by Christian: Jan 8 2006, 08:12 PM
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post
gnuneo
post Jan 8 2006, 09:54 PM
Post #30


Nenemo Ari
********

Group: Members
Posts: 6,367
Joined: 17-June 02
From: over..... there.
Member No.: 42



christian: i'm sure its a truly brilliant peice of scholarly study, which in its eloquence will pick us up from our dreary mental ruts and fling us to dance in the stars with the new, mindblowing understanding we will recieve from it.

but, urrmm - where is it? linky?
Top
User is offlinePMEmail Poster
Quote Post

2 Pages  1 2 >
Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic

 


Lo-Fi Version
Time is now: 15th June 2006 - 03:24 AM